Here it should not be assumed that the officer or firefighter should file the initial claim themselves. If your employer has already treated you as being disabled, the employer is the one with the mandatory duty to file the application. This valuable right is often overlooked when the employer advises you to “… just file your application and if its denied, then we’ll figure out what to do next.” This should never be the basis of your decision to take on the burden of proving that you are disabled from your usual duties. An experienced retirement litigator will be able to assist you in enforcing your right to have the employer make the application.Our law firm has already established THAT law against the County of Riverside in a CalPERS case.
Or maybe there is a psychological aspect to your disability claim. Your worker’s compensation case may be limited because of the reform laws enacted to restrict an employee’s right to benefits for an emotional injury. Our law firm has already obtained the Supreme Court decision that worker’s compensation reform rules do not control a disability retirement claim.
When a disability retirement claim goes to hearing, the dispute is usually between competing doctor’s opinions. Often the employer, or pension fund, will hire a defense doctorversed in denying disability retirement claims who must be cross-examined and shown to have relied on incorrect legal theories, incorrect medical history or incorrect employment factors.
In CalPERS cases, where disability is established there can be a need for a second hearing before the Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board where the only issue is whether the officer or firefighter’s disability is “industrial.” Again, our law firm has already obtained a decision from the Supreme Court that details that “industrial” does not require the employee to prove that their employment was more than a real and measurable contributing factor.
Here one must first appeal to the Superior Court and follow all the rules for arguing that the decision to deny a claim should be reversed. Following the Superior Court, an employee also has the right to appeal to the California Court of Appeal and to also, thereafter, petition to the Supreme Court for relief. Our law firm has successfully handled cases at every appellate level.
We will discuss the merits of your case and give you an honest assessment. We can also represent most clients on a contingency fee basis
Faunce, Singer & Oatman
301 E. Colorado Blvd. #705
Pasadena, CA 91101
County Employees
CalPERs Sworn Employees
CalPERs Non-Sworn Employees
Public Employees’ Retirement System
What Should I Know About The Nolan Decision?
“Expedited Hearing Procedure”, A Good Idea?
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |